Sharing a post that was made on FB:
What happened during the elections
*Honorable mention is,The Clinton campaign paid for people to fight at the Trump rallies...they paid the person to strike and the person to get hit*
1)Bernie Sanders was cheated in the primaries
2)Bernie Sanders plotted with Hillary to bring his voters over to vote for her
3)OBAMA hired Russians(CrowdStrike) to be over the DNC and DCCC
4)Those same Russians installed a program called Falcon to spy and watch the workers
5)The Falcon program found a #[3251] worker by the name #[1638]
6)THEY saw Seth taking information(uploading a thumbdrive) of Hillary cheating in the primaries and money laundering
7)When Seth Rich obtained the information he gave it to #[3180]
8 )Hillary and the Russian company(Crowdstrike) found out and killed him
9)Wikileaks released the emails and that's where the proof of selling Russia uranium was highlighted
1this is where we found proof of child trafficking and child sacrifice and #[5304]
11)this is where #[8757] comes in for the #[8758] Shawn served the DNC lawsuit papers for voter fraud,Hillary and the gang killed him weeks later
12)Hillary and gang killed some of the lawyers involved with the lawsuit
13)Then they killed the new York judge and other people involved with exposing the visa fraud,which helped voter registration fraud *aka* sounds familiar which introduces why they fighting for #[8759]
14)Emails from Seth Rich shows that John Podesta and Hillary Clinton made up a Russia story way before the election(we showed receipts as well)
15)It shows that they intentional chose to elevate Trump in a strategy called #[8760] ,it makes him look good during the primaries and then they drop the ceiling on him for a Hillary victory
16)They put people within his campaign that had ties to Russia so they could have "insurance" if he won
17)they put surveillance" #[1259] " on the agents they put in his campaign so they can wiretap and watch Trump
18)Haiti was peeking it's head back into the election and government officials of #[4938] that were speaking out and suppose to testify against hillary,died or committed suicide all of a sudden
19)Obama and Hillary teamed up with the CIA and FBI and NSA to push a Russian narrative to win the election
2Obama allowed the British government to spy on Trump in his family
21)So in other words a president allowed a foreign government to spy on a presidential nominee
22)So Obama spied and great Britain helped spy,then Obama campaigned for Hillary on the Campaign trail
23)Trump teamed up with admiral Rogers and found out about the surveillance
24)When Obama found out he immediately begged the American people not to vote for trump,he told them he would destroy my legacy
25)Trump won
26)that's when the plot expanded and got bigger
27)that's why Hillary Clinton never did a public Concession speech(she implemented the Russia story in hopes of winning the seat by default)
28)Obama like I said found out that Trump knew he was spying on him so he quickly expelled the Russian ambassador(it was +2so they couldn't be interviewed or interrogated
29)Obama started strick sanctions on Russia
3with hopes of bullying Trump into a war with Russia so it would take the heat off of hill and himself(obama)
3The media and the CIA pushed #[8761] to full steam
31)Obama and Hillary and George soros started paying for antifa and blm and paid for riots to overthrow Trump
32)Donald Trump was still under surveillance as president
°•..•.° .°.•.°.°. To be continued
Sharing a post that was made on FB:
What happened during the elections
*Honorable mention is,The Clinton campaign paid for people to fight at the Trump rallies...they paid the person to strike and the person to get hit*
1)Bernie Sanders was cheated in the primaries
2)Bernie Sanders plotted with Hillary to bring his voters over to vote for her
3)OBAMA hired Russians(CrowdStrike) to be over the DNC and DCCC
4)Those same Russians installed a program called Falcon to spy and watch the workers
5)The Falcon program found a #[3251] worker by the name #[1638]
6)THEY saw Seth taking information(uploading a thumbdrive) of Hillary cheating in the primaries and money laundering
7)When Seth Rich obtained the information he gave it to #[3180]
8 )Hillary and the Russian company(Crowdstrike) found out and killed him
9)Wikileaks released the emails and that's where the proof of selling Russia uranium was highlighted
1this is where we found proof of child trafficking and child sacrifice and #[5304]
11)this is where #[8757] comes in for the #[8758] Shawn served the DNC lawsuit papers for voter fraud,Hillary and the gang killed him weeks later
12)Hillary and gang killed some of the lawyers involved with the lawsuit
13)Then they killed the new York judge and other people involved with exposing the visa fraud,which helped voter registration fraud *aka* sounds familiar which introduces why they fighting for #[8759]
14)Emails from Seth Rich shows that John Podesta and Hillary Clinton made up a Russia story way before the election(we showed receipts as well)
15)It shows that they intentional chose to elevate Trump in a strategy called #[8760] ,it makes him look good during the primaries and then they drop the ceiling on him for a Hillary victory
16)They put people within his campaign that had ties to Russia so they could have "insurance" if he won
17)they put surveillance" #[1259] " on the agents they put in his campaign so they can wiretap and watch Trump
18)Haiti was peeking it's head back into the election and government officials of #[4938] that were speaking out and suppose to testify against hillary,died or committed suicide all of a sudden
19)Obama and Hillary teamed up with the CIA and FBI and NSA to push a Russian narrative to win the election
2Obama allowed the British government to spy on Trump in his family
21)So in other words a president allowed a foreign government to spy on a presidential nominee
22)So Obama spied and great Britain helped spy,then Obama campaigned for Hillary on the Campaign trail
23)Trump teamed up with admiral Rogers and found out about the surveillance
24)When Obama found out he immediately begged the American people not to vote for trump,he told them he would destroy my legacy
25)Trump won
26)that's when the plot expanded and got bigger
27)that's why Hillary Clinton never did a public Concession speech(she implemented the Russia story in hopes of winning the seat by default)
28)Obama like I said found out that Trump knew he was spying on him so he quickly expelled the Russian ambassador(it was +2so they couldn't be interviewed or interrogated
29)Obama started strick sanctions on Russia
3with hopes of bullying Trump into a war with Russia so it would take the heat off of hill and himself(obama)
3The media and the CIA pushed #[8761] to full steam
31)Obama and Hillary and George soros started paying for antifa and blm and paid for riots to overthrow Trump
32)Donald Trump was still under surveillance as president
°•..•.° .°.•.°.°. To be continued
Tuesday March 19, 2019
The Supreme Court on Tuesday endorsed the U.S. government's authority to detain immigrants awaiting deportation anytime - potentially even years - after they have completed prison terms for criminal convictions, handing President Donald Trump a victory as he pursues hardline immigration policies.
The court ruled 5-4 along ideological lines, with its conservative justices in the majority and its liberal justices dissenting, that federal authorities could pick up such immigrants and place them into indefinite detention anytime, not just immediately after they finish their prison sentences.
The ruling, authored by conservative Justice Samuel Alito, left open the possibility that some individual immigrants could challenge their detention. These immigrants potentially could argue that the use of the 1996 federal law involved in the case, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, against them long after finishing their sentences would violate their due process rights under the U.S. Constitution.
The law states the government can detain convicted immigrants "when the alien is released" from criminal detention. Civil rights lawyers argued that the language of the law shows that it applies only immediately after immigrants are released. The Trump administration said the government should have the power to detain such immigrants anytime.
It is not the court's job, Alito wrote, to impose a time limit for when immigrants can be detained after serving a prison sentence. Alito noted that the court has said in the past that "an official's crucial duties are better carried out late than never."
Alito said the challengers' assertion that immigrants had to be detained within 24 hours of ending a prison sentence is "especially hard to swallow."
In dissent, liberal Justice Stephen Breyer questioned whether the U.S. Congress when it wrote the law "meant to allow the government to apprehend persons years after their release from prison and hold them indefinitely without a bail hearing."
Tuesday's decision follows a February 2018 ruling in a similar case in which the conservative majority, over liberal dissent, curbed the ability of immigrants held in long-term detention during deportation proceedings to argue for release.
Cecilia Wang, the American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who argued the newly decided case for the challengers, said that in both rulings "the Supreme Court has endorsed the most extreme interpretation of immigration detention statutes, allowing mass incarceration of people without any hearing, simply because they are defending themselves against a deportation charge."
Trump has backed limits on legal and illegal immigrants since taking office in January 2017.
Kerri Kupec, a U.S. Justice Department spokeswoman, said administration officials were pleased with the ruling.
In both of the detention cases, the Supreme Court reversed the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a liberal leaning court that Trump has frequently criticized. In each case, litigation against the federal government started before Trump took office.
In the latest case, the administration had appealed a 2016 9th Circuit ruling that favored immigrants, a decision it said would undermine the government's ability to deport immigrants who have committed crimes.
The appeals court had said that convicted immigrants who are not immediately detained by immigration authorities after finishing their sentences but then later picked by immigration authorities could seek bond hearings to argue for their release.
The plaintiffs included two legal U.S. residents involved in separate lawsuits filed in 2013, a Cambodian immigrant named Mony Preap convicted of marijuana possession and a Palestinian immigrant named Bassam Yusuf Khoury convicted of attempting to manufacture a controlled substance.
Under federal immigration law, immigrants convicted of certain offenses are subject to mandatory detention during their deportation process. They can be held indefinitely without a bond hearing after completing their sentences.
In the most significant immigration-related case recently before the court, the conservative justices were also in the majority in June 2018 when they upheld on a 5-4 vote Trump's travel ban on targeting people from several
Tuesday March 19, 2019
The Supreme Court on Tuesday endorsed the U.S. government's authority to detain immigrants awaiting deportation anytime - potentially even years - after they have completed prison terms for criminal convictions, handing President Donald Trump a victory as he pursues hardline immigration policies.
The court ruled 5-4 along ideological lines, with its conservative justices in the majority and its liberal justices dissenting, that federal authorities could pick up such immigrants and place them into indefinite detention anytime, not just immediately after they finish their prison sentences.
The ruling, authored by conservative Justice Samuel Alito, left open the possibility that some individual immigrants could challenge their detention. These immigrants potentially could argue that the use of the 1996 federal law involved in the case, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, against them long after finishing their sentences would violate their due process rights under the U.S. Constitution.
The law states the government can detain convicted immigrants "when the alien is released" from criminal detention. Civil rights lawyers argued that the language of the law shows that it applies only immediately after immigrants are released. The Trump administration said the government should have the power to detain such immigrants anytime.
It is not the court's job, Alito wrote, to impose a time limit for when immigrants can be detained after serving a prison sentence. Alito noted that the court has said in the past that "an official's crucial duties are better carried out late than never."
Alito said the challengers' assertion that immigrants had to be detained within 24 hours of ending a prison sentence is "especially hard to swallow."
In dissent, liberal Justice Stephen Breyer questioned whether the U.S. Congress when it wrote the law "meant to allow the government to apprehend persons years after their release from prison and hold them indefinitely without a bail hearing."
Tuesday's decision follows a February 2018 ruling in a similar case in which the conservative majority, over liberal dissent, curbed the ability of immigrants held in long-term detention during deportation proceedings to argue for release.
Cecilia Wang, the American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who argued the newly decided case for the challengers, said that in both rulings "the Supreme Court has endorsed the most extreme interpretation of immigration detention statutes, allowing mass incarceration of people without any hearing, simply because they are defending themselves against a deportation charge."
Trump has backed limits on legal and illegal immigrants since taking office in January 2017.
Kerri Kupec, a U.S. Justice Department spokeswoman, said administration officials were pleased with the ruling.
In both of the detention cases, the Supreme Court reversed the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a liberal leaning court that Trump has frequently criticized. In each case, litigation against the federal government started before Trump took office.
In the latest case, the administration had appealed a 2016 9th Circuit ruling that favored immigrants, a decision it said would undermine the government's ability to deport immigrants who have committed crimes.
The appeals court had said that convicted immigrants who are not immediately detained by immigration authorities after finishing their sentences but then later picked by immigration authorities could seek bond hearings to argue for their release.
The plaintiffs included two legal U.S. residents involved in separate lawsuits filed in 2013, a Cambodian immigrant named Mony Preap convicted of marijuana possession and a Palestinian immigrant named Bassam Yusuf Khoury convicted of attempting to manufacture a controlled substance.
Under federal immigration law, immigrants convicted of certain offenses are subject to mandatory detention during their deportation process. They can be held indefinitely without a bond hearing after completing their sentences.
In the most significant immigration-related case recently before the court, the conservative justices were also in the majority in June 2018 when they upheld on a 5-4 vote Trump's travel ban on targeting people from several
Crop your avatar
