But the facts remain......
Fact no 1- In the real world, no existing lens will keep in focus both the landing gear and the distant scenery.
It is called Depth of field-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field
Fact no – 2 The FOX5 Sept11 2001 broadcasts have only recently (2012) been added to the official 9/11 TV archives. 43 minutes of the crucial early hours have been simply BLANKED OUT by– FOX
FACT- 3- The missing 43 minutes of footage contains damming evidence of computer generated imagery in the “live” broadcasts.
Analysis- 1-2-3 - Helicopter Skids
Located- fox flop- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....=Ls0CRXEVO34&fea
One of the core 'ideas' of the 9/11 video animators was to imprint in the public the illusion that "TV CHOPPERS" were dispatched in the Manhattan airspace to spectacularly 'capture the action'. To this end, they fabricated the shots illustrated here. Aerial shots were crucial to give TV viewers the impression of clear, unobstructed visuals of the events. To have the chopper skids pass in front of the camera lens - they figured - would also convince TV viewers that they were actually looking at images filmed by a TV chopper...In fact, most of us did. However, it is now time to call these preposterous images by name: preposterous video animations.
In the real world, no one would be so silly to attach a camera on a helicopter in a position where its view might be blocked by the landing gear (chopper cameras are front-mounted in a gyroscopic system designed to stabilize chopper roll). In the real world, no existing lens will keep in focus both the landing gear and the distant scenery. In the real world, no such camera will 'freeze' the distant scenery while the chopper rotates around its axis.
The darkish yellow-green color-scheme of this FOX broadcast are plainly absurd. Only one rational explanation may be formulated: This is fabricated / manipulated / forged / fraudulent photography. Have a look at this comparison- http://www.facebook.com/photo.....php?fbid=51904940147
Analysis GIFS-
http://i1131.photobucket.com/a....lbums/m551/equinox91
Located in fox footage WNYW News Live 9/11
-
Helicopter Skid_1 @19.31 mins- http://www.youtube.com/watch?f....eature=player_detail
Helicopter Skid_2 @25.09 mins -http://www.youtube.com/watch?f....eature=player_detail
Helicopter Skid_3 @25.55 mins - http://www.youtube.com/watch?f....eature=player_detail
Analysis 4- Rendering glitchs
Located- Fox Flop- - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ls0CRXEV ... age#t=188s
The rendering glitches from this city scape 3d environment are not any known TV transmission disturbance. A flaw of this glitch is the fact that only the smoke is affected where the sky drop is UN affected.
Analysis GIFS-
http://i1131.photobucket.com/a....lbums/m551/equinox91
Located in fox footages WNYW News Live 9/11
Rendering glitch_1
@22.26 -http://www.youtube.com/watch?f....eature=player_detail
Rendering glitch_ 2
@23.28- https://www.youtube.com/watch?....v=gQdpTzqh8Ag&fe
Analysis 5- Nosed out.
Located - NOSED OUT - 7.30 mins
Link- http://youtu.be/M5-xcvv_fRQ
This is the only LIVE clip which you will not find in the TV archives: the infamous "Nose-In/Nose-out fiasco" is featured in September Clues and comprehensively analyzed in NOSED OUT. It was broadcast live by WNYW-FOX5 and replayed by CNN 6min later (albeit with a large CNN-banner covering the "plane". The fundamental question this shot raises is: "Can a passenger airplane crash into a steel tower and emerge from the other side with its cockpit intact?"
Analysis GIFS-
http://www.septemberclues.info..../images/NOSEIN_NOSEO
http://www.septemberclues.info..../images/NOSEIN_NOSEO
Located in fox footage WNYW News Live 9/11
@ 15.28- http://www.youtube.com/watch?f....eature=player_detail
Nosed out fiasco- Unbelievable Triple zooms.
I suggest having a view of this looped GIF several times,
http://www.septclues.com/ANIMA....TED%20GIF%20FILES%20
The key aspects are the 3 quick zooms and a timed
“plane appearance”
Now have a look at the actual footage,
I suggest watching to take in the scenario first,
Jump straight from 15 mins here-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....=gQdpTzqh8Ag&fea
The scenario is flight 11 has supposedly crashed and there is just couple of alleged cameras in downtown Manhatten focusing on the world trade centre on fire.
The fox helicopter (chopper 5 ) has not appeared in the morning broadcasts at all.
Then the supposed chopper 5 footage is starts to feature at 9.01 am approx 15.26 mins into the broadcast – (jump there) http://www.youtube.com/watch?f....eature=player_detail
…
The style of these 3 fast rapid zoom INS are not repeated again that morning. Only long and slow zooms are featured in the broadcast.
After a several seconds, the footage performs a 3 zoom action and then the plane appears in the pan.
What are the chances the chopper footage just happened to be ready before the impact, remotely small?
But the odds of a 3 motion zoom and the plane appearing timed perfectly to the micro second!
Is pushing it a bit far don't you think ?
