:Leon-George:Sinclair.continued......‘Malfeasance/Misfeasance/nonfeasance, in public office’
‘Aiding & Abetting in a Treasonous Act’
‘Trying to obtain money via deception’
‘Gross Misconduct in public office’
And already, im spending time and money in this nonsense case, born out of an error that your client, or you, or someone, has made – so from this letter onwards, my fees for replying to postal letters are £150 GBP per letter, telephone calls are charged at £12.00 GBP per minute, or part thereof. I do not correspond via email.
Should harassment continue, I will be seeking from the Chancery Division of the High Courts the sum of:
£60,000 GBP stress and mental anguish
£20,000 Per person, for Trespass
£20,000 for unlawful removal of property, and 150 per day PER ITEM for the items removed, until they are returned.
Administrative courts are…… unlawful:
“The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is NO authority for administrative courts in this country and no Act can be passed to legitimise them because of the constitutional restraints placed upon her Majesty at Her coronation. The collection of revenue by such means is extortion, and extortion has been found reprehensible since ancient times. That has been so ever since the Bill of Rights.”
08 -10 – 1986 vol 480 cc246-95 246 at 250. [15/12/2011 22:30:58] catherine.crossan1: Halsbury's Laws of England/ADMINISTRATIVE LAW (VOLUME 1(1) (2001 REISSUE))/1. INTRODUCTION/(1) SCOPE AND NATURE OF THE SUBJECT/1.
We find for example, that in the council tax regulations, the billing authority, the prosecuting authority and the enforcement authority are all vested in the same body. This is an unlawful situation, that a Chancery Court Hearing will iron-out, if need be.
So, please find enclosed here the full settlement of the erroneous accounts that you have been mistakenly given by your client/s. Please send a receipt within 14 days of the date of this letter.
Many thanks & warmest Regards
Name & signed
